Sunday, July 26, 2026

House Passes Two Major Changes to Collective Bargaining Law

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Steptoe & Johnson PLLC <info-steptoe-johnson.com@shared1.ccsend.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:58 AM
Subject: House Passes Two Major Changes to Collective Bargaining Law
To: <mcandrse@wvstateu.edu>


House Passes Two Major Changes to Collective Bargaining Law

Details


On June 9, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Faster Labor Contracts Act (H.R.5408) (FLCA) by a vote of 230-193. If passed by the Senate (60 votes required) and signed by the President, this bill will constitute two of the most significant overhauls to the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) in over eight decades. First, the FLCA allows a private arbitration panel to impose the terms of a first-time labor contract where the union and employer cannot reach agreement with the assistance of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS). Second, the FLCA appears to remove the longstanding right of all employers to unilaterally implement a last, best, and final contract proposal when the parties reach a good faith impasse.


Initial Labor Contracts Can Be Written by Private Arbitration Panels


Currently, the NLRA requires that parties negotiate in good faith to reach a labor contract but does not impose contract terms or set time deadlines for reaching an agreement on a first contract. This is important because first contracts often require 12 to 18 months to conclude due to the numerous and complicated issues presented. However, absent agreement between the parties, the FLCA would change this long-standing legal process by imposing the following strict, and quite impracticable, timeline for negotiations:


  • After a bargaining request from a newly certified union, the parties have no more than 10 days to meet and begin the collective bargaining process.


  • The parties then have a 90-day bargaining period to reach agreement on the entire contract.


  • If no agreement is reached after 90 days, either party may request mediation through the FMCS.


  • Upon a request for FMCS mediation, the parties have 30 days to resolve the dispute in mediation.


  • If FMCS mediation is unsuccessful after 30 days, FMCS shall refer the contract dispute to a three-person arbitration panel consisting of one member selected by the union, one member selected by the employer, and one neutral member mutually agreed upon by both parties.


  • The arbitration panel must be selected within 14 days of the FMCS referral; if this deadline is not met, FMCS shall designate any panel arbitrators not selected by the parties.


Under the FLCA, the arbitration panel, by majority vote, can settle the contract dispute and impose all of the terms of a binding first contract that will remain in effect for two years. As a practical matter, those initial contract terms determined by the private arbitration panel would set the standard for all future contracts because of the difficulty of unwinding the many complex provisions that go into a collective bargaining agreement.


In writing the parties’ labor agreement, the arbitration panel is directed to consider the following: (1) the employer’s financial status and prospects; (2) the size and type of the employer’s operations and business; (3) the employees’ cost of living; (4) the employees’ ability to sustain themselves, their families, and their dependents on the wages and benefits they earn from the employer; and (5) the wages and benefits other employers in the same business provide their employees.


To summarize, the FLCA would compress first contract traditional bargaining into slightly over 4 months; after that, the parties lose control to interest arbitration.


Employers Can No Longer Implement Last, Best, and Final Offers at Impasse


The FLCA’s second major change to the law of collective bargaining is the removal of the employer’s right to unilaterally implement its last, best, and final offer when the parties reach a good faith impasse. To effect this change, the FLCA modifies Section 8(d) of the NLRA by adding an employer obligation “to maintain current wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment pending an agreement.” This employer obligation to maintain all current terms and conditions of employment extends indefinitely beyond the point when the parties reach a good faith impasse to the date the parties reach agreement. Significantly, this obligation to maintain current terms and conditions of employment applies not just to first contracts, but rather to all employers and all contracts.


Parting Thoughts


The FLCA creates a number of practical problems for both employers and unions. Those include the following.


  • Under current law, with neither side compelled to agree to any particular proposal, the possibility of strikes, boycotts, lockouts, striker replacements, and implementation at impasse creates bargaining leverage for the parties which normally leads to agreement. Under the FLCA, however, this leverage is replaced by negotiation deadlines followed by binding arbitration. Potentially, employers and unions will be less likely to compromise if they believe they can do better in arbitration. Further, both sides may stick to extreme positions, believing that the arbitration panel may split the differences.


  • Panel arbitrators may not understand the business (staffing levels; production methods; incentive compensation; etc.), yet they are empowered to bind the parties on all issues for two years. Even worse, if the panel imposes a bad first contract, that contract will likely serve as a problematic baseline for many years to come.


  • The FMCS is understaffed, which increases the likelihood that mediations will be unsuccessful, and more disputes will be submitted to binding arbitration.


  • Litigation is likely to ensue. Courts will be asked to interpret the new statute and define the limits of the arbitrators’ authority. If either the NLRB or FMCS adopts regulations implementing the new statute, there may be challenges under the Administrative Procedures Act. Arbitration awards may be challenged. Unfair labor practice charges may be filed. And, it is likely that there will be constitutional challenges to the FLCA. This litigation will take years to resolve, and in the meantime, employers and labor unions will be forced to operate in a legally uncertain environment, as opposed to the present negotiation environment that has been in effect for over 80 years.


One must ask if the perceived gains of the FLCA are really worth the upheaval which will result. The present system may not be perfect, but it is stable.


At Steptoe & Johnson, we have a team of labor attorneys who are ready to help you navigate union campaigns and contract negotiations — and to navigate even seismic shifts in the law. Please reach out to a member of our Labor Relations team if you have any questions or need any assistance.


The author thanks Alexis Geary, Summer Associate, for her contributions to this article.

Author

Robert M. Steptoe Jr.

Of Counsel | Labor & Employment


(304) 933-8142

Click Here to Email

Copyright © 2026 Steptoe & Johnson PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational purposes. These materials reflect only the personal views of the authors and are not individualized legal advice. It is understood that each case is fact-specific, and that the appropriate solution in any case will vary. Therefore, these materials may or may not be relevant to any particular situation. Thus, the authors and Steptoe & Johnson PLLC cannot be bound either philosophically or as representatives of their various present and future clients to the comments expressed in these materials. The presentation of these materials does not establish any form of attorney-client relationship with the authors or Steptoe & Johnson PLLC. While every attempt was made to ensure that these materials are accurate, errors or omissions may be contained therein, for which any liability is disclaimed.
Steptoe & Johnson PLLC

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC | 400 White Oaks Boulevard | Bridgeport, WV 26330 US

Unsubscribe | Update Profile | Our Privacy Policy | Constant Contact Data Notice

Constant Contact

202627 Reminder: Employer Obligations to Those on Military Leave


Sean McAndrews, MA
Associate AD Senior Compliance, Administration
3047664122 office
West Virginia State University

https://ncaad2rules.blogspot.com/


---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Steptoe & Johnson PLLC <info-steptoe-johnson.com@shared1.ccsend.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 9:08 AM
Subject: Reminder: Employer Obligations to Those on Military Leave
To: <mcandrse@wvstateu.edu>


Employer Obligations to 
Those on Military Leave

Details


Most HR professionals are aware that under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) and similar state laws, they must provide military leave for employees with military service obligations, such as those who serve in the National Guard and military reserves and reemploy them when that duty is over. What often is not clear is what obligations employers have while their employees are on military leave.


USERRA Protections Are Far Broader Than Most Employment Laws

The first thing to be aware of is that USERRA may apply to an employer even if the employer has too few employees to be covered by other employment laws. Under USERRA, “employer” is defined as “any person, institution, organization, or other entity that pays salary or wages for work performed, or that has control over employment opportunities.” Unlike other federal employment laws, such as the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), there are no exceptions based on the size of the employer or the number of employees. “Employee” is defined as “any person employed by an employer.”


USERRA’s protections apply to all employment positions, including those that are for a brief, nonrecurrent period and for which there is no reasonable expectation that the employment position will continue indefinitely or for a significant period. USERRA does not require an employee to have been employed for a certain length of time before being covered by USERRA, as the FMLA does. Similarly, there are no exceptions, as there are in the Fair Labor Standards Act, for executive, administrative, or professional employees.


The employee is entitled to military leave whether serving in the reserves or volunteering for duty. USERRA provides for military leave for an employee’s “service in the uniformed services,” which includes all categories of military training and service, including duty performed on a voluntary or involuntary basis, in time of peace or war.


Similarly, USERRA’s notice requirement is far broader than under other laws. Subject to certain exceptions, to be entitled to USERRA’s protections, the employee must notify the employer that they intend to leave employment to serve in the uniformed services. The notice may be either verbal or in writing and does not need to follow any particular format. USERRA does not specify how far in advance the notice must be given; it simply requires that the employee provide notice as far in advance as is reasonable under the circumstances.


Obligations While the Employee Is on Military Leave

While the employee is away on military leave, they are considered to be on a furlough or leave of absence and are entitled to the same nonseniority rights and benefits generally provided by the employer to other employees with similar seniority, status, and pay who are on similar furloughs or leaves of absence. USERRA does not, however, require that covered employees be provided with paid military leave or be compensated for the difference between their military pay and what they would make in civilian employment. But some state military leave laws do.


For example, West Virginia’s military leave law, which only applies to public employers, requires that employees receive up to 30 days of military leave each year “without loss of pay” and up to an additional 30 days if activated under certain federal authority. The statute specifies that “without loss of pay” means that employees must receive their normal compensation, so simply making up the difference between military and civilian pay will not suffice.


Questions often arise about whether employees on extended military leave are entitled to accrue vacation or sick leave or to receive bonuses that are paid while they are on military leave. The answer depends on how the employer treats other employees who are on similar nonmilitary forms of leave.


Although USERRA requires that employees receive the same nonseniority rights and benefits generally provided to other employees on similar furloughs or leaves of absence, an employee away on military leave is not entitled to any additional benefits or preferential treatment. Thus, if employees on similar nonmilitary leave, such as FMLA leave or an unpaid leave of absence, accrue vacation or sick leave or are paid a bonus, employees on military leave must receive the same benefit. If the employer does not provide these benefits to other employees on similar leaves, it does not need to provide them to employees on military leave.


Similarly, if an employer pays out vacation all at once at the beginning of the year, the employer may prorate the amount of vacation based on an employee’s absences for military leave the previous year only if the employer prorates vacation for other employees on similar nonmilitary leaves of absence.


It is important to remember, however, that while accrual of leave is a nonseniority benefit that only has to be provided to employees on military leave the same as it is to other employees on comparable nonmilitary leaves, if leave accrues at different rates based on length of employment, then the time spent on military leave must count toward employment for determining the rate of leave accrual.


For example, suppose an employer provides two weeks of vacation per year for employees with one to four years of employment, and then increase their vacation to three weeks per year after five years of employment. If an employee with four years of service takes a year of military leave and then returns, they will now be eligible for three weeks of vacation per year because the year of military leave counts toward their length of employment.


If an employee has health plan coverage, the plan must permit the employee to continue the coverage for him- or herself and any covered dependents for the lesser of 24 months following the beginning of the military leave or the date when they fail to return from service or apply for a position of reemployment. If the period of military service is less than 31 days, the employee cannot be required to pay more than the regular employee share for health plan coverage. For periods of service 31 days or longer, however, the employee may be required to pay up to 102% of the full premium under the plan.


USERRA does not specify how an employee must elect to continue health plan coverage; therefore, health plan administrators may develop reasonable requirements addressing how continuing coverage may be elected, consistent with the terms of the plan and USERRA’s exceptions to the requirement that the employee give advance notice of service in the uniformed services.


Another question that often comes up is whether the employer can fill the position of someone who is away on extended military leave. The answer is yes, but the new employee may need to be bumped upon the service member’s return. Nothing in USERRA prohibits an employer from hiring a replacement for an employee who is away on military leave. USERRA only concerns itself with the service member-employee’s reemployment rights. In fact, the regulations implementing USERRA expressly contemplate that an employer may hire a replacement for an employee while the employee is away on military leave, but the employer still has to reemploy the returning service member. Employers may not refuse to reemploy a returning employee on the basis that another employee was hired to fill the vacated position during the employee’s time on military leave, even if reemployment might require the termination of that replacement employee.


The Bottom Line

Reemploying an employee who is away for a short period of military leave, such as a drill weekend or two-week annual training, usually does not raise an issue for most employers. When employees take extended periods of military leave, however, employers must be aware of their obligations to those employees under both USERRA and applicable state law. And because employers typically do not deal with military leave as often as they do FMLA leave or workers’ compensation leave, they may be less certain about what those obligations are.



If in doubt, a quick call to your employment lawyer can save you a lot of headaches (and possibly money). Please reach out to a member of our Labor & Employment Compliance team if you have any questions or need any assistance.

Author

Mark G. Jeffries

Of Counsel | Labor & Employment


(304) 933-8155

Click Here to Email

Copyright © 2026 Steptoe & Johnson PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational purposes. These materials reflect only the personal views of the authors and are not individualized legal advice. It is understood that each case is fact-specific, and that the appropriate solution in any case will vary. Therefore, these materials may or may not be relevant to any particular situation. Thus, the authors and Steptoe & Johnson PLLC cannot be bound either philosophically or as representatives of their various present and future clients to the comments expressed in these materials. The presentation of these materials does not establish any form of attorney-client relationship with the authors or Steptoe & Johnson PLLC. While every attempt was made to ensure that these materials are accurate, errors or omissions may be contained therein, for which any liability is disclaimed.
Steptoe & Johnson PLLC

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC | 400 White Oaks Boulevard | Bridgeport, WV 26330 US

Unsubscribe | Update Profile | Our Privacy Policy | Constant Contact Data Notice

Constant Contact

Friday, July 24, 2026

D2 SCHOOL SUED BY WHISTLEBLOWER OVER STUDENT ATHLETE SAFETY - New MExico Highlands 202627

Sean McAndrews, MA
Associate AD Senior Compliance, Administration
3047664122 office
West Virginia State University

https://ncaad2rules.blogspot.com/


"Work hard in silence, let your success be your noise" - Anonymous


Please report IT, COL and Physical Facilities issues by sending an email with complete information to the appropriate address:

Click link to start workorder

NFL SAFETY & HEALTH VIDEO 202627



Sean McAndrews, MA
Associate AD Senior Compliance, Administration
3047664122 office
West Virginia State University

https://ncaad2rules.blogspot.com/


"Work hard in silence, let your success be your noise" - Anonymous


Please report IT, COL and Physical Facilities issues by sending an email with complete information to the appropriate address:

Click link to start workorder

Watch Sean Mcandrews's LiveTrack

Sean Mcandrews
Sean Mcandrews started an activity
Follow their location and stats on LiveTrack.
View Activity on LiveTrack
© 2026 Garmin Ltd. or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. Garmin International, 1200 E. 151st Street, Olathe, KS, 66062

Monday, July 20, 2026

Watch Sean Mcandrews's LiveTrack

Sean Mcandrews
Sean Mcandrews started an activity
Follow their location and stats on LiveTrack.
View Activity on LiveTrack
© 2026 Garmin Ltd. or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. Garmin International, 1200 E. 151st Street, Olathe, KS, 66062